It can be a scum tell. If the flow is changing from one person to another, especially to a villager (can be both from a villager or from a mafia), then a mafia is likely to change his vote with it. Mafioso are fine with whoever is being voted, as long as it's not one of them.Changing votes is not a bad thing at all, it's completely normal practice. Lynching someone based on that is just plain stupid.
SDS hasn't done subbing yet because those people were sending in their actions.So which inactive person are we lynching today? I don't have a preference among them and it seems to me that as leads have basically dried up, we have nothing but those being inactive. It's worth noting the ones who just come to life when we threaten to lynch too, if they don't say anything substantial. (hint hint) So if any of you have a preference go ahead and justify it. I am wondering why SDS hasn't been doing subbings yet though.
I agree with Mekkah, the one who we should be looking for is someone who was attacking someone else at first being keen on lynching him but ended up changing his vote with little to no reasoning("What XXX Said makes sense! Unfire YYY Fire ZZZ")It can be a scum tell. If the flow is changing from one person to another, especially to a villager (can be both from a villager or from a mafia), then a mafia is likely to change his vote with it. Mafioso are fine with whoever is being voted, as long as it's not one of them.
I actually find this more suspicious than not posting at all; a person idles to avoid attention, yet RaRe555 has not avoided attention, he has simply not participated in discussion. I would also be less suspicious if we hadn't told him before role PMs were assigned that he was expected to be a weak-willed and not entirely competent player; it is as if he is playing that role perfectly. "Oh, I'm sorry guys, I just don't have anything interesting to say." So, I would rather see a little more from Tyranidos before voting for him, for the time being I'd prefer to lynch an idler, or perhaps fire RaRe555.First, you have already posted most, if not all, the substantial stuff.
Second, I'm not exactly an insightful person, so i don't tend to post substantial.
Since my post at the beginning of day 2, I have just given my opinion, and I just didn't have anything else substantial to say.
I acknowledged that going with the flow was a mafia tell, but changing votes really isn't.It can be a scum tell. If the flow is changing from one person to another, especially to a villager (can be both from a villager or from a mafia), then a mafia is likely to change his vote with it. Mafioso are fine with whoever is being voted, as long as it's not one of them.
I completely agree. I have been waiting for someone to say this, and I am voting tyranidosLook, we could either lynch all of the people with <100 posts, or we could actually promote discussion by accusing players who can actually defend themselves.
While RaRe555's post seems only to confirm any suspicions of him that I previously had ('I'm not mafia, and neither is the person accusing me, THIS person is mafia' is a common mafia tactic), I feel that Tyranidos or Thunda would be better proposed lynches for today.
Yeah, I'll admit that there isn't much point to all of us voting someone different, so I'll follow your lead, since I do think that Thunda's lack of serious input is pretty suspicious considering the fact that he is a "name" player. So with that in mind, I'll change my vote to fire Thunda.Look, we could either lynch all of the people with <100 posts, or we could actually promote discussion by accusing players who can actually defend themselves.
While RaRe555's post seems only to confirm any suspicions of him that I previously had ('I'm not mafia, and neither is the person accusing me, THIS person is mafia' is a common mafia tactic), I feel that Tyranidos or Thunda would be better proposed lynches for today.
i suppose so, but i had real life priorities to take care of, last week was hell in terms of school workjumpluff said:Tyranidos, you had multiple opportunities to join in with us during our conversations before you lost computer access.
why vote me over thunda? i may seem suspicious due to me "suddenly voting for tenken" that one time. but that was immediately after jumpluff had pointed out substantial evidence against tenken. do i seriously need to post "yes i agree with [user], therefore i [vote user]?Johann said:I completely agree. I have been waiting for someone to say this, and I am voting tyranidos
the bold is why i believe that thunda shouldn't be lynched, assuming that there is no trend where he mostly trolls when he is mafia. i will not vote until i get more specific reasoning why thunda/anyone else should be lynched.Mekkah said:Well, thunda likely doesn't care about this game. He is generally either on top of games, or he just doesn't really do anything but trolling.