There are two ways I see it on when/how the tier could be selected.
One, the OU should be the tier we'll focus on principle (meaning it'll be the default tier). If there's no talk of the next project for another tier by anyone, then we'll just do OU like normal.
We could also make sure we do at least two/three OU projects or so, before we discuss about whether or not the next will be another tier.
--
Two, after establishing the PR team and TL/ATL, then a poll can be posted asking what tier to focus on. What I don't like about it is that it means by just seeing, say, the Uber tier available, a lot of members (especially those new to CAP) might select it just because we'll have the ability to create a powerful Pokemon. This is not a problem, but if done for every project, then it's likely to do Uber multiple times (one after another), when OU gives us the most learning opportunities.
We could allow only CAP mods, TL, ATL, and the PRT to vote on the poll, but that removes the community input about a critical issue.
One, the OU should be the tier we'll focus on principle (meaning it'll be the default tier). If there's no talk of the next project for another tier by anyone, then we'll just do OU like normal.
We could also make sure we do at least two/three OU projects or so, before we discuss about whether or not the next will be another tier.
--
Two, after establishing the PR team and TL/ATL, then a poll can be posted asking what tier to focus on. What I don't like about it is that it means by just seeing, say, the Uber tier available, a lot of members (especially those new to CAP) might select it just because we'll have the ability to create a powerful Pokemon. This is not a problem, but if done for every project, then it's likely to do Uber multiple times (one after another), when OU gives us the most learning opportunities.
We could allow only CAP mods, TL, ATL, and the PRT to vote on the poll, but that removes the community input about a critical issue.