Lol, no Grawl. What you "want" and what Democratic "is" are completely different.
"Bandwagoning" is perfectly Democratic, and one of the truly fascinating aspects of it, in my opinion. If people wish to bandwagon in a truly Democratic vote by jumping to Scrappy and therefore eliminating Battle Armor, it would be perfectly Democratic and perfectly acceptable.
The bottom line is that many individuals put their votes into Greenhouse and have been presented with a limited opportunity to change their votes (at the very least, their opportunity was not equal to the other's), and the presence of Greenhouse itself could have easily influenced the vote in the very way Grawl is lamenting against.
There were very extreme opinions on Greenhouse, and it is feasible that people bandwagoned to one of the obvious big two to make sure that Greenhouse did not win.
A vote with Greenhouse is a vote that does not truly represent what the people of CaP want, regardless of whether removing it would make a practical difference or not.
Remember, the beauty of the CaP project is that it is entirely a Democratic process.