NP: Afrika Bambaataa - Looking for the Perfect Beat [Planet Rock]
How do mini-mods get selected?
The new mini-mod shall be voted on from canidates endorced by former mini-mods.In addition, mini-mods can only serve twice NON CONSECUTIVE.
Like DougJustDoug said, this is not a position of much prestige. It will be very time consuming and rigorous. The selection of the Mini-Moderator should be a community decision. If the mini-moderator wants to continue their position, and has done a good job then they should not be denied the burden of doing a vast majority of the public work :P
What are the qualifications?
The qualifications should be that whe have been with the project for at least two pokemon and had to be there from the beginning of the pokemon. I.E. JoeSchmo worked on syclant, he is now eligible. However if you start in the middle or end of a pokemon, you have to wait for two more to be done.
Again, I believe this is silly. Smogon caters to a more mature audience, and I am sure that the members who really deserve this position are prepared enough to head the project regardless of participation. Cooper and Xyra have etched a path for future moderators to follow so the position should not be hard.
What are their responsibilties?
Mini-mods must start every poll. In the event that a mini-mod is unable to start one, a second will be chosen for the mini-mod's absence. This second will be chosen by the mini-mod before the start of a new project, and must be a former mini-mod.
The threads, in my opinion, should not only be started by the Mini-Moderator. The drafting and outlining should since they will be in charge of accessing the masses. The "subordinates," rather the people involved in the process should have the option of creating threads as well due to time constraints and what nots.
What "powers" do they have?
The mini-mod can vote on every poll EXCEPT if their art is in the art poll. It is their duty to keep every discussion on-track, and if they need to they can discount someone's vote if they get too roudy. This will be enforced by dougjustdoug after a discussion with him.
Unlike you, I believe the role of the mini-moderator is a much different role. The mini-moderator should be in charge of what direction the program will go in. This means deciding what step to start with, which entries to keep for the final polls, and keeping other project participants in line.
What steps do we vote on?
What is the general sequence of polls?
the general sequence is as follows: 1. Is it an evolution or new pokemon? (If it is an evolution, then of what pokemon?) 2.What will be the types? (Start Art Thread.) 3. What will be the role? 4.What will be the ability? 5.What will be the bst? 6. What will be the stat spread? (Start movepool thread.)7.What will be the art? (Start Spriting Thread)8.What will be the movepool? (Bold text vote.)9. What will the name be? 10.What will the pokedex entry be? 11.What will the sprite be? 12. Will there be pre-evos? (If so, decide on the information in a separate set of polls.)13.Who will the next mini-mod be?
I believe all projects will be based off new Pokemons, or at least they should be.
- Pre-Evolution? IE. Mime Jr.
- Stages 1,2,3, 1 < 2&3, 2<3&4 (Branches off like Gloom and Kirlia)
- Base Stat TotalsEgg Group IE. Mineral, Dragon, Bug, Water 3, etc.
- Move Selection (Egg group first to determine Egg Moves)
- Art
- Pokedex Entry
The decision of the Mini-Moderator should be made at the end of the project.
What are the details of "complex" polls?
What types are included in the typing poll?
Are "previously used" types excluded? Why?
The top three types from the previous two pokemon are excluded. Also, all type combinations previously used by us cannot be used. This is to prevent something like Ghost/Steel, which isn't very imaginative.
I believe there should not be a restriction on the typing made regardless of previous typing.
How are art and sprite submissions gathered?
They are gathered in a separate thread.
Agreed. Drawings first then spriting.
How do you determine which art is included in the first art poll?
This will be at the mini-mod's discression, but it has to be within reason. The first poll will have ten choices with two votes per person, and any submission with over 25% of the vote moves on. The next poll will have one vote for a maximium of four choices.
The art should be determined by the community via a poll. There should be an opening thread with submissions. Entries which do not meet a certain criteria should be disallowed. This of course would probably mean users with a tablet, scanner, or vector art programs will have a greater chance of getting in due to the nature of the results of the products.
Why do certain people get to submit base stats?
This is to keep JoeSchmo from admitting rediculous spreads. This will be at the mini-mod's discression, based on trust and calculations.
I believe this should be open to more people BUT with a strict restriction. The mini-moderator or a different program head should allowed people to submit it. There should be a criteria rubric set up for this and should only be permitted via PM before being allowed in the actual thread.
How are movelists determined?
There will be a big pool of movesets and one combined one, and people will vote on the "issues" such as W-o-W on Revenankh. This will be like Hyra did it.
I believe the move list should be determined after the typing, evolution stages, and egg group. I know there is no chance of the Pokemon making it in-game but we are going for a highly organized realistic project right? This would also allow for a "modified" server to be played on. IE with the introduction of XYZ Crobat can now learn Nasty Plot and Hypnosis :P
Which polls should be single choice?
1,2,3,4,5,9,12.
I believe all final polls should. There should be a total of 3 polls for every step of the program.
Which should be multi-choice?
7,10,11.
In multi-choice polls, what is the threshold for a "winning" choice?
25% of the vote to move on.
The preliminary polls should be multi-choice.
What is bold text voting? How are they counted? Can bold votes be changed?
Only poll 6 and 8 should be bold text voting because people must back up their votes. They will be counted individually by the mini-mod. Bold votes cannot be changed to prevent counter-voting.
I believe Bold Text Voting could work if 3-5 people tally up all the votes individually to eliminate any discrepancy in the numbers. BTV should be used for Move Pool finalization, Egg Groups, and Type nominations.
Can the mini-mod choose any voting method on any poll?
No, the mini-mod should stick to the methods given.
The mini-moderator should decide which method is best. Obviously I said that other people involved in the project should have the option of starting threads but they would have to follow the mini-moderators guidelines.
How is playtesting organized?
Playtesting is organized by a tourniment of 16 trusted users. Eight people can use the new pokemon, eight cannot. (I saw this with the rainbow and eon tournys.)These people will be chosen by the mini-mod. HOWEVER, while this is going on, other users will be able to use the new pokemon. The point of this is to get the experienced people to figure out innovative ways to use and defend against the pokemon to determine if it needs to be revised.
With the vast majority of experienced players on Smogon I don't think it would be hard to run an open server much like the one DGD has. I believe everyone participating should submit Logs as often as possible.
A thing I noticed with the Sylcant testing was that some people were not running teams using it. This was off putting to some users but I believe it attributes to a better understanding of the Pokemon. Organizing matches so that it is custom Pokemon Vs. regular Pokemon is a great idea.
The Pokemon should be primarily testing in OU and Uber environments IMO.
How long do we playtest a pokemon?
The pokemon should be playtested for one month.
A month sounds good but giving how thorough the process is this would be a bit much. Considering outsiders to the project might get involved in the battling there might be a bit of a bias in the data.
What conditions would cause a revision to a pokemon?
The conditions for a pokemon to be revised should be directly from the result of a tourniment.
Thorough input by a member participating in the project. This can be anyone involved in the creation process or battling. I find that experienced battlers give great input when it comes to certain Pokemon. IE. Mamoswine rampaging through many teams.
How are revisions proposed and voted on?
The players in the tourniment can propose revisions, but they cannot vote on them. Only non-players can vote on the revisions.
This doesn't make sense.
People who have a "guaranteed certification" of having participating and proving themselves knowledgeable should be allowed to vote on this.