So there was some offline discussion around the Fusions Metagame between KaenSoul and I, Below is the thread. TLDR; I believe KaenSoul should respectfully reconsider his assessment of Fusions as a Metagame, as I don't believe the level of scrutiny between Cross Evolution and Frantic Fusions holds up and that the player base should decide the fate of Fusions through the voting stage. I'm saddened that the radio silence after my last posting has occurred, but it seems that refusing to continue discussion has left me no choice but to call out KaenSoul for his actions. I have given him 8 hours to respond, but to no avail. So I copy paste the offline discussion for Public Discourse to decide the fate of Fusions (see below).
Let me reintegrate that Fusions is a different Metagame than Cross Evolution and Frantic Fusions, the level to which the scrutiny over how similar the Metagame between Fusions and Cross Evolutions exists is absurd. Why does Frantic Fusions get a pass and be accepted as a Metagame when anyone can see how similar it is to Cross Evolutions, why does Fusions get scrutinized to this level of Similarities such that it gets rejected. Again, I say let the player base decide the fate of Fusions through the voting stage, at least then if it fails miserably the player base has spoken, and the Metagame fails due to community census and not just the gate-keeping of one individual. I leave the burden of proof with the community to decide the fate of Fusions.
-------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------------
Yesterday at 11:56 PM
Hey saw your response to my post in the Metagame Workshop,
I'd like to first start of by saying that Fusions is different from other Cross evolution because it uses Pokemon at any evolutionary stage, and its different from frantic fusions because its the average BST of the two fusion Pokemon instead of donor's base stats quartered (rounded down) and added on top of its base stats, except HP.
Second, I think banning Pokemon with a BST above 600 will make the Meta very interesting, which differentiates the Meta from Cross Evo and Frantic Fusions which don't have such limitations. Plus trapping may be legal in Fusions as opposed to Cross Evo and Frantic Fusions.
I respectfully ask for you to reconsider your assessment of Fusions.
Reply
Edit
KaenSoul
Shared:Power Little Knight
Community Leader
Today at 12:15 AM
The responses should stay in the thread so anyone can commend on it, but anyway, frantic fusions originally had the same way to define stats but was changed because is not that impactful, and either way, even if your format is different, it doesn't change the fact we already have plenty with a similar premise, we don't need another to compete with that niche.
Check out my
fakemons!
Like Reply
CamJay12
Today at 12:24 AM
I honestly don't think that Metagames should be seen as competition for niches, I see Fusions as its own separate Metagame, plus I think the people at Cross Evo and Frantic Fusions, wouldn't mind there being a Similar Metagame being present. Having this level of scrutiny is obscene if you compare Cross Evo to Frantic Fusions, Which one came first? Why wasn't the second one rejected, oh right it wasn't, and anyone can see the similarities between those two meta-games. Allowing one to exist but not the other would be absurd. This level of scrutiny doesn't hold up unless your going to scrutinize every Metagame to this level.
I strongly think you should reconsidered. Theres no denying that Fusions has an element of Cross Evo and Frantic Fusions present, but that is not the only element in the Metagame. I'm not trying to reinvent the wheel here, just trying to take the natural evolution of the wheel and run with it as it were.
Reply
Edit
KaenSoul
Shared:Power Little Knight
Community Leader
Today at 12:54 AM
Again we should leave these discussions to the thread because is better if they are public but whatever.
Formats compete for a niche, because regardless of we liking it or not, there are so many OM players, we can't have too many formats that are similar to each other, or we just divide their playerbase, then none get enough popularity to actually get anywhere.
We have been more strict with these for around a year, that's why is not that weird to find formats that are similar to each other, we are trying to change that.
Check out my
fakemons!
Like Reply
CamJay12
Today at 1:06 AM
Look I don't mind copy pasting this discussion into the Metagame Workshop for Public discourse.
I disagree that dividing the OM player base is a real issue. We have 3 OM that get spotlighted each month, there's plenty of OM players to go around. If Fusions, Cross Evolutions, and Frantic Fusions all get spotlighted than I could see there being a split in the OM Player base, but I Highly doubt that those 3 Metagames would all be spotlighted simultaneously, I see the rotation of the OM player base as a healthy part of the meta, it keeps ideas fresh.
Again I think you should reconsidered, there's no way that Fusions, Cross Evolutions, and Frantic Fusions would all be spotlighted in a month, that's why the voting stage exists, let the player base decide if they want Fusions to be spotlighted for a month, try it out, see how its different from other Metagames. What harm is there in trying out a Metagame? It takes up one slot in the OMotM, and if it fails miserably than at least we know that the player base has spoken.
Reply
Edit
CamJay12
Today at 7:37 AM
Just heard about Pokeathlon, a dedicated server to Fusions, but there is like 20 people max on the server, think bringing Fusions to the masses would help boost Pokeathlon numbers.