I especially don't want chancellor Blazade after his reply to me, which was p hypocrtical.
A fascist in that position knows a liberal policy will be passed regardless and I'll concede they potentially make that play but it's also arguably not better for them to just let someone else test and it's WIFOM.
A liberal in that position who is new at the game and just looking to pass liberal policies just wants to not take any risks in the matter. You can argue about theoretical play but we're straight up not there yet.
You call my assumption that a Fascist would make the ideal Fascist play a WIFOM, but then for no reason at all say that a new liberal may choose to just assure liberal policies, which is the exact same argument. Except the part where mine isn't WIFOM, Fascist would never test, therefore as long as Earlio's play matches up with what a Fascist would do there always, claiming he is liberal and to be trust just due to that is silliness incarnate.
Late game you force it, but where we at, confirming intent is far more important. For zorbees, it's like never putting 2 people into a res party then having to add one at random to the final decision. We need info, if we don't have info we will end up in a limited clean pool, and the very big likelyhood of randing policies or having hitler elected.