sorry but as of this morning, this is a rematchWon in an unfortunate one vs March Fires, gl in future weeks
https://replay.pokemonshowdown.com/smogtours-gen8ou-585104
Nails | 52 | 2 | YoBuddy |
Paraplegic | 40 | 14 | Actuarily |
Z Strats | 52 | 2 | Frania |
Qwello Lee | 35 | 19 | Spurrific |
stax | 37 | 17 | Mishimono |
Player | Week 1 | Week 2 | Week 3 | Week 4 | Week 5 |
Z Strats | 33% | 77% | 67% | 88% | 96% |
Nails | 85% | 76% | 93% | 93% | 96% |
Qwello Lee | 67% | 45% | 53% | 88% | 65% |
Mishimono | 63% | 55% | 33% | 79% | 31% |
Paraplegic | 26% | 46% | 33% | 12% | 74% |
Spurrific | 65% | 23% | 67% | 7% | 35% |
stax | 74% | 24% | 47% | 69% | 69% |
Frania | 15% | 54% | 19% | 21% | 4% |
Memoric / YoBuddy | 37% | 66% | 81% | 12% | 4% |
Actuarily / zeefable | 35% | 34% | 7% | 31% | 26% |
Why waste time making predicts every week for nitro when I can get it for free from one of my friends who bought 2 discord nitros by accident and doesn't need bothParticipation stayed mostly constant from 58 to 54 predictors this week! Remember, you can win $50 + Discord Nitro just from bolding names in our SCL Discussion Thread! Here are my favorite prediction posts: 1, 2, 3, 4.
Nails (96%) vs. YoBuddy (4%)
Paraplegic (74%) vs. Actuarily (26%)
Z Strats (96%) vs. Frania (4%)
Qwello Lee (65%) vs. Spurrific (35%)
stax (69%) vs. Mishimono (31%)
Nails 52 2 YoBuddy Paraplegic 40 14 Actuarily Z Strats 52 2 Frania Qwello Lee 35 19 Spurrific stax 37 17 Mishimono
Player Week 1 Week 2 Week 3 Week 4 Week 5 Z Strats 33% 77% 67% 88% 96% Nails 85% 76% 93% 93% 96% Qwello Lee 67% 45% 53% 88% 65% Mishimono 63% 55% 33% 79% 31% Paraplegic 26% 46% 33% 12% 74% Spurrific 65% 23% 67% 7% 35% stax 74% 24% 47% 69% 69% Frania 15% 54% 19% 21% 4% Memoric / YoBuddy 37% 66% 81% 12% 4% Actuarily / zeefable 35% 34% 7% 31% 26%
REJEREJEREJEREJEREJEREJEREJEREJEREJEREJEREJEREJEREJE
And i forgive you for calling Greece a dogshit country. I'm glad to see you are doing well Lax!
After reading this, I want you to go to your router and unplug it. Then take your keyboard, take out all the keys, and dump it in the trash. And finally take your monitor, turn it off and pack it away in a box. Every time you type you just make things worse cause not only do you look beyond cringe, now my days ruined cause I had to read something you typed out and now that’s 2 perfectly good days ruined for no reason.BRO IT’S PROOF NOT PROOFS
Merritt, surely this is a joke.Re: Sagiri vs Santu
During Santu and Sagiri's game yesterday, Santu timed out. Prior to running out of time and afterwards, Santu claimed that the simulator was not registering when they selected a move, and that their attempts to fix the issue by reloading the battle did not fix it either time they tried.
The host team agreed to a recreation under the assumption of a simulator glitch, as Santu's behavior in the battle log lined up with their claims, it was both early in the battle and Santu had a fair amount of time remaining when they claimed to be experiencing issues, Santu stated their issues with the simulator accepting their moves in battle chat before timing out, this is an infrequently reported but not unprecedented glitch, and a quick recreation would not provide a significant advantage to either player.
I personally failed to perform the recreation correctly and put Santu and Sagiri in the wrong playing positions, resulting in a team leak. The responsibility for this failure is on me alone, not on any actions made by Santu, Sagiri, or any fault of how recreations are done. Due to this, a fair recreation was no longer possible.
At this point, alternative options such as forcing a rematch with different teams require a higher threshold of proof that the simulator was glitching. As Santu was unable to provide conclusive evidence that they were experiencing a true simulator glitch, the host team is forced to rule as though it did not actually occur. Since Santu's normal timer ran out, Sagiri is given the win by timer.
You're generating more confusion. The decision for the recreate WAS reached and the TD's were to IMPLEMENT the teams and the game was going to be done and it would've counted. Any argumentation for rogue hosting falls flat when it's a TD that's hosting.let me lay it out for those confused
- santu timed out
- timing out (not dc’ing) as is objectively defined by the rules = loss
- santu loses regardless of recreate
- recreate should have never been done
- recreate was done poorly
- this doesn’t change anything it just looks stupid
- tds did not endorse the recreate i think it was just rogue hosts
- apology should be issued to santu / his team for getting his hopes up, not for the loss
and that would’ve been an improper decision. the recreate never should’ve counted in the first place if the tds understood their own rules. unfortunately they don’t thoughYou're generating more confusion. The decision for the recreate WAS reached and the TD's were to IMPLEMENT the teams and the game was going to be done and it would've counted.
Looks like we've hit the crux of the problem - TD's not understanding their own rules leads to outright manipulation of (one of) the most prestigious tours on Smogon. I like all of you TD's personally - I understand this is a thankless job, but today no one need thank you.and that would’ve been an improper decision. the recreate never should’ve counted in the first place if the tds understood their own rules. unfortunately they don’t though
Yeah lol this is the only point that matters now.You're generating more confusion. The decision for the recreate WAS reached and the TD's were to IMPLEMENT the teams and the game was going to be done and it would've counted. Any argumentation for rogue hosting falls flat when it's a TD that's hosting.