Thanks.the first always and forever
unless 'SS Carracosta' happens to be a set name and even then it's quite questionable
Thanks.the first always and forever
unless 'SS Carracosta' happens to be a set name and even then it's quite questionable
The standard name should still be in parentheses if they insist on using a funny nameA few days ago, I saw somebody (a qc leader I think) talk about the amount of 'unique' set names given to non-'special' pokemon. Is this an issue, and should we start somewhat normalizing these names, or is that a qc thing, or just leave it be?
When you can't afford an S.S. Anne ticket, sometimes you have to settle for the second best option...the first always and forever
unless 'SS Carracosta' happens to be a set name and even then it's quite questionable
I'm fine with adding 'Mega slot' as a phrase; it's already used so frequently that an attempt to so suddenly ban it will probably fail. You're also right that there does not seem to be any other more efficient way to convey its meaning.Ok, so using 'opportunity cost' to describe using a certain Mega Pokemon isn't allowed. But how do we feel about 'Mega slot'? Quite frankly I see no way to rephrase this without an excessive number of words, which we wouldn't want. Problem with "officially" adding 'Mega slot' to our "accepted" vocabulary is the phrase attracts 'opportunity cost' like no tomorrow. What are people's thoughts on this?
It's a very minor thing, but I'm essentially asking if "these Pokemon hate" should be changed to something like "that these Pokemon can't handle well on their own" or "that these Pokemon have problems with." Obviously the alternatives are wordier, but that doesn't mean that "hate" is any more accurate, necessarily, because I don't think that's a realistic description.SpDef Skarmory said:In return, Skarmory counters the Fairy-types that these Pokemon hate.
They either shouldn't even be defined as a "hidden ability" at all (if it is it's probably just fluff) or if they need to be Dream World ability to stay consistent with the earlier stuff.'Hidden Ability' or 'hidden ability'? The couple dex entries I can find that use it don't seem to be consistent, I don't want to rely on outside sources because we deviate from the in-game spelling in lowercasing plain 'ability', and it isn't covered in the standards as far as I can see, so yeah.
I'm changing it to 'hidden ability' for now for consistency with us lowercasing plain 'ability', but I reckon uniformity/clarity would be nice :3
nopehi!
Some analyses mention moves, items, EV spreads, etc. in Set Comments when they aren't even mentioned in the set (ex: in a Pelliper analysis, the writer discusses Air Slash and Rocky Helmet in Moves and Set Details, but neither of those are actually listed in the set.) Should anything alternate that isn't mentioned in the actual set be moved to Other Options?